What HeLa Cells Are You Using?

  1. 1.  Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061

Abstract

The HeLa cell line, named after the patient Henrietta Lacks, was one the first human cell lines to be used for tissue culture. In the decades since its origin, it has become a feature in labs across the world. Despite its longevity, repeated detection of most HeLa marker chromosomes have lead the scientific community to view HeLa as a stable cell line and its corresponding findings to be reproducible. However, to date no investigation has examined other meaningful aspects of HeLa's genomic variability, such has whether HeLa's modal chromosome number remains constant. Considering the importance of a cell line's karyotype with respect to reproducibility, I sought to examine the stability of HeLa's karyotype by examining HeLa's modal chromosome number as reported in the literature.

Background

Science has made great advances due to the ability to manipulate biological processes in a controlled manner. One of the most notable achievements was the establishment of cell lines. The most famous cell line was established by G.O. Gey at Johns Hopkins in 1951, after deriving the cells from the cervical cancer of Henrietta Lacks (HeLa) (Gey and Coffman 1952, Jones et al. 1971). In the over half-century since, HeLa has made major contributions to science. Indeed a PubMed search for "HeLa" yields nearly 80,000 results.

Shortly after HeLa was established, scientists began attempting to make other types of cell lines, but had little means of properly identifying cell types. Early classification methods were primitive, with one assay screening for the production of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), an enzyme thought to be found almost entirely in African Americans (Gartler 1968). Gartler et al observed G6PD in 20 human aneuploid cells (most of which he knew were collected from Caucasians) and lead him to discover a massive international cell contamination (Gartler 1968). The contaminant was HeLa, and the discovery unveiled a pandemic of HeLa contamination (Culliton 1974).

These hard lessons taught scientists the importance of accurately identifying cell lines and correctly attributing specific cellular properties to the appropriate corresponding cell line. Consequently, the HeLa contamination drove the development of better techniques for characterizing and differentiating between cells lines.

Early cytogenetic analysis of HeLa cells relied on Giemsa staining to produce distinct chromosome bands and examine HeLa's genomic landscape (Chu and Giles 1958, Nelson-Rees and Flandermeyer 1976, Hsu and Moorhead 1956, Seabright 1973). This lead to the discovery of HeLa's numerous chromosome aberrations, and made identifying HeLa-specific marker chromosomes the highest priority (Lavappa, Macy, and Shannon 1976, Chen 2008).

Today, most cytogenetic analysis of HeLa has been performed by FISH, and G-banding. (Francke, Hammond, and Schneider 1973, Nelson-Rees et al. 1980, Kraemer et al. 1974, Heneen 1976, Stanbridge et al. 1981, Chen 2008). Along with G-banding, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) also facilitates chromosome classification through hybridization to metaphase slides. The most comprehensive analysis of HeLa to date, occurred relatively recently following the advent of Spectral Karyotyping (SKY) technology.

HeLa cells possess a hypertriploid (3n+) karyotype and produce heterogeneous cell populations (Ghosh and Ghosh 1970, Leone, Hsu, and Pomerat 1955, Ghosh and Ghosh 1975). HeLa cells differ in both their total number of chromosomes and in the quantity of specific numerical chromosome groups (Hered 1960). When Chu and Giles et al. examined parental HeLa cell lines and a series of clones derived from the stock, they found wide variation in modal chromosome numbers (Chu and Giles 1958). Ghosh et al discovered variation of stemline karyotype and rise of stable independent karyotype subpopulations from the "HeLa cell line (modal number 69)" (Ghosh and Ghosh 1975). Similarly, Macville et al. reported that 60% of the parental HeLa cells have a modal chromosome number of 78, and noted the emergence of a phenotypically distinct subpopulation of cells with their own, stable karyotype (N=73) (Macville et al. 1999, Tjio and Puck 1958).

Macville et al undertook one the most extensive examinations of HeLa cell stability assessing the parental HeLa cell line's marker chromosomes and comparing their findings with several studies published a decade earlier (Macville et al. 1999). Macville et al identified eight chromosome markers that had been previously published, in addition to identifying novel chromosome makers for HeLa (Macville et al. 1999). On the basis of this conserved marker chromosome expression, over a decade, Macville et al determined the HeLa cell line to be stable (Macville et al. 1999). However, what Macville et al and many other HeLa researchers failed to consider was the cell lines overall karyotype and the effects numerical and structure.

Macville et al. report a HeLa modal karyotype of 78 (range: 76-80) after performing SKY analysis on HeLa cells obtained at passage 90-102 from ATCC (Macville et al. 1999, ATCC). Interestingly, ATCC reports that the same HeLa cells have a different modal karyotype and a much broader karyotypic range (N=82;70-164) (ATCC). Not surprisingly, HeLa's modal karyotype varies widely between research publications (Table 1). One explanation is HeLa's inherent genomic instability. HeLa cells frequently experience abnormal mitoses with varying rates of chromosome missegregation (Chu and Giles 1958), ranging from 7.25%-10% (Shi and King 2005).

The gain or loss of even a single chromosome drastically changes a cells entire genomic landscape (Upender et al. 2004). Aneuploidy changes the expression of hundreds-to-thousands of genes, and directly alters the cell's phenotype (Pavelka et al. 2010, Ly et al. 2011, Upender et al. 2004, Gao et al. 2007, Gemoll et al. 2014). Indeed, each chromosome carries hundreds to thousands of genes, with capable of altering the expression of additional genes when they are over/underexpressed on other chromosomes (e.g. transcription factors), which in turn may affect the expression of other genes. Not surprisingly, under normal conditions aneuploidy is detrimental to cell survival because, as suggested by Amon et al, "the severity of the phenotypes caused by aneuploidy correlates with the number of genes gained or lost" (Sheltzer and Amon 2011). Under abnormal/stressful conditions, aneuploidy, and consequentially the gene dosage imbalance, can improve cellular fitness and confer a selective advantage (Pavelka, Rancati, and Li 2010, Rancati et al. 2008, Duncan et al. 2012, Pavelka et al. 2010). Previous studies have shown genomic aberrations to HeLa's karyotype can directly influence its phenotype (Vogt 1959, Gille and Joenje 1989, Gey and Coffman 1952). Despite the importance of a cell's karyotype, the inconsistent reporting of HeLa's karyotype has largely been ignored (Chu and Giles 1958, Vogt 1959).

Aneuploidy is ubiquitous in cancer and a signature characteristic of the HeLa cell line (Nicholson and Cimini 2013, 2012, ATCC). Numerous studies report observing distinct HeLa subpopulations emerge from a parental stem-line HeLa population, possessing divergent but stable karyotypes (Stone and Kang 1964, Ghosh and Ghosh 1970, Dziekanowska and Szurman 1968, Spurna and Hill 1967). Others have acknowledged HeLa's genomic instability, and some have even suggested that this may lead to more variable findings (Grenman, Shapira, and Carey 1988, Bonita, Eraydin, and Majumdar 1999, Putral et al. 2005, Koivusalo et al. 2005, Singer and Fishman 1974, Hsu 1961).

Accordingly, chromosome markers are reliable for cell line identification, but have been shown here to be inadequate markers of HeLa's genomic stability, and may in fact be confounding numerous studies results (Macville et al. 1999). If "HeLa" cells used in two labs both share the same "HeLa" marker chromosomes but differ in modal chromosome number, are the cells really the same or do the cells only share the same name? How does this difference in karyotype affect reproducibility? Interestingly, a similar controversy arose between different laboratories culturing the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line when they reported differences in protein expression and phenotype (Reddel et al. 1985, Graham et al. 1985, Graham et al. 1986, Osborne, Hobbs, and Trent 1987, Hand et al. 1983). Cytogenetic analysis between parental and independent derived subclones revealed extensive aneuploidy with the loss of marker chromosomes being rare but the formation of additional structural abnormalities occurring frequently (Whang-Peng et al. 1983) reflecting the cell line's inherent genomic instability and ongoing process of selection and adaptation. Accordingly, researchers conducted cytogenetic analysis of MCF-7 cells cultured in different laboratories and found several conserved chromosome translocations but also significant numbers of unique alterations characterizing each variant (Bahia et al. 2002, Osborne, Hobbs, and Trent 1987).

Studies attempting to definitively characterize HeLa's genomic constitution and assess the cell lines stability concluded the cell line to be stable following the detection of in part or whole of 18/20 HeLa marker chromosomes (Macville et al. 1999, Landry et al. 2013, Chen 2008). These studies emphasized the identification and similarities in the few marker chromosomes, rather than taking into account the differences chromosome-specific copy number and structural aberrations that directly impact the karyotype, and thus phenotype, as a whole.

In conclusion, the HeLa cell karyotype varies dramatically between laboratories. Consequently, since karyotypic changes even for one specific chromosome, either in structural composition or copy number alteration, directly effects the genomic landscape the karyotypic composition is critical to determining cellular phenotype. The conservation for certain specific marker chromosomes observed between laboratories confirms the identity and origin of the cell line in question, however falls short of supporting their reproducibility utility. Thus, in cancer research where the stakes are high and the need for novel, reproducible discovery is great I wonder if the HeLa cell line is still an appropriate model for research, other than to understand karyotypic changes or the dynamics of genomic instability.

Table 1 Karyotypic Variability Within HeLa Cell Lines Between Labs

HeLa Cell Line

Modal Chr. Number

Reference

HeLa

82; 70-164

(ATCC)

HeLa

78; 76-80

(Macville et al. 1999)

HeLa

60; 57-63

(Francke, Hammond, and Schneider 1973)

HeLa

65; 62-67

(Ash et al. 1984)

HeLa

74; 69-77

(Mincheva, Gissmann, and Zur Hausen 1987)

HeLa

84; 58-179

(Lavappa, Macy, and Shannon 1976)

HeLa

80; 79-81

(Bottomley, Trainer, and Griffin 1969)

HeLa

51

(Hughes 1965)

HeLa

60

(Obara et al. 1974)

HeLa

67

(Duesberg et al. 2011)

HeLa

69

(Ghosh and Ghosh 1975)

HeLa

71

(Czaker 1973)

HeLa

67

(Popescu and DiPaolo 1989)

HeLa

77

(Heneen 1976)

HeLa

69

(Singer and Fishman 1974)

HeLa

57; 54-59

(Harris et al. 1965)

HeLa

69; 67-70

(Cireli, Frimmel, and Schwarzacher 1966)

HeLa

61; 59-62

(Cireli, Frimmel, and Schwarzacher 1966)

HeLa

69; 66-71

(Spurna and Hill 1967)

HeLa

70; 68-72

(Cerny, Korych, and Soukup 1964)

HeLa Kyoto

65; 62-68

(Landry et al. 2013)

HeLa St1

77

(Vogt 1959)

HeLa F8

70

(Vogt 1959)

HeLa D98/AH-2

62; 58-65

(Stanbridge et al. 1981)

HeLa-S3

68; 51-74

(Lavappa, Macy, and Shannon 1976)

HeLa-S3

68

(Gille and Joenje 1989)

HeLa-20

112

(Gille and Joenje 1989)

HeLa-80

84

(Gille and Joenje 1989)

M-HeLa-76

49

(Savelyeva and Mamaeva 1987)

HeLa-20

50; 49-50

(Mamaeva, Litvinchuk, and Pinaev 1983)

HeLa Ep. 1

72; (68-76)

(Norryd 1959)

HeLa

75; (73-76)

(Heneen 1976)

HeLa D98/AG

63

(Heneen 1976)

REFERENCES

Ash, J.F., R.M. Fineman, T. Kalka, M. Morgan, and B. Wire. 1984. "Amplification of sodium-and potassium-activated adenosinetriphosphatase in HeLa cells by ouabain step selection." The Journal of cell biology no. 99 (3):971-983. doi: 10.1083/jcb.99.3.971

ATCC. HeLa (ATCC¨ CRMCCL2ª) Product Sheet. In Catalogue of Strains-II, edited by American Type Culture Collection: J. E. Shannon and M. L. Macy~Eds.

Bahia, H, JNE Ashman, L Cawkwell, M Lind, JRT Monson, PJ Drew, and J Greenman. 2002. "Karyotypic variation between independently cultured strains of the cell line MCF-7 identified by multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization." International journal of oncology no. 20 (3):489-494.

Bonita, D.M., N.B. Eraydin, and S.K. Majumdar. 1999. "Response of non-breast cancer cells to tamoxifen in the presence and absence of β-estradiol." The Nucleus. (42):49-55.

Bottomley, RH, AL Trainer, and MJ Griffin. 1969. "Enzymatic and chromosomal characterization of HeLa variants." The Journal of cell biology no. 41 (3):806-815.

Cerny, M.B., B. Korych, and F. Soukup. 1964. "Verification of species characteristics of some cell lines in Czechoslovakia." Journal Hygine Epidemiology Microbial Immunology no. 8:353-363.

Chen, T.R. 2008. "Re-evaluation of HeLa, HeLa S3, and HEp-2 karyotypes." Cytogenet Genome Res no. 48 (1):19-24. doi: 10.1159/000132579.

Chu, E.H., and N.G. Giles. 1958. "Comparative chromosomal studies on mammalian cells in culture. I. The HeLa strain and its mutant clonal derivatives." J Natl Cancer Inst no. 20 (2):383-401. doi: 07.551.11.4002.

Cireli, E., J. Frimmel, and H.G. Schwarzacher. 1966. "Cytogenetische Studien an HeLa-Zellen. I. Chromosomen, DNS-Gehalt und Struktur der Interphasenkerne." Cells Tissues Organs no. 65 (1-3):170-181. doi: 10.1159/000142871.

Culliton, B.J. 1974. "HeLa Cells: Contaminating Cultures around the World." Science no. 184 (4141):1058-1059. doi: 10.1126/science.184.4141.1058.

Czaker, R. 1973. "Banding patterns and late replication in HeLa cells." Humangenetik no. 19 (2):135-144. doi: 10.1007/BF00282190.

Duesberg, P., D. Mandrioli, A. McCormack, and J.M. Nicholson. 2011. "Is carcinogenesis a form of speciation." Cell Cycle no. 10 (13):2100-2114. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.13.16352.

Duncan, A.W., A.E.H. Newell, W. Bi, M.J. Finegold, S.B. Olson, A.L. Beaudet, and M. Grompe. 2012. "Aneuploidy as a mechanism for stress-induced liver adaptation." The Journal of clinical investigation no. 122 (9):3307. doi: 10.1172/JCI64026.

Dziekanowska, D, and J Szurman. 1968. "A hela subline with an established chromosome pattern and with a stemline chromosome number of 59." Genetica no. 39 (1):237-244. doi: 10.1007/BF02324466.

Francke, U., D.S. Hammond, and J.A. Schneider. 1973. "The band patterns of twelve D 98/AH-2 marker chromosomes and their use for identification of intraspecific cell hybrids." Chromosoma no. 41 (1):111-121. doi: 10.1007/BF00284079.

Gao, C.F., K. Furge, J. Koeman, K. Dykema, Y. Su, M.L. Cutler, A. Werts, P. Haak, and G.F. Vande Woude. 2007. "Chromosome instability, chromosome transcriptome, and clonal evolution of tumor cell populations." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences no. 104 (21):8995-9000. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700631104

Gartler, S.M. 1968. "Apparent HeLa Cell Contamination of Human Heteroploid Cell Lines." Nature no. 217 (5130):750-751. doi: 10.1038/217750a0.

Gemoll, T., J.K. Habermann, S. Becker, S. Szymczak, M.B. Upender, H.P. Bruch, U. Hellman, T. Ried, G. Auer, H. Jornvall, and U.J. Roblick. 2014. "Chromosomal aneuploidy affects the global proteome equilibrium of colorectal cancer cells." Anal Cell Pathol (Amst). doi: 10.3233/acp-140088.

Gey, G.O., and W.D. Kubicek Coffman, M.T. . 1952. "Tissue culture studies of the proliferative capacity of cervical carcinoma and normal epithelium." Cancer Research no. 12:264-265.

Ghosh, I., and S. Ghosh. 1970. "Karyological studies on two HeLa lines." Zeitschrift fŸr Krebsforschung no. 74 (1):103-109. doi: 10.1007/BF00524685.

Ghosh, S., and I. Ghosh. 1975. "Variation of stemline karyotype in a HeLa cell line." Zeitschrift fŸr Krebsforschung und Klinische Onkologie no. 84 (2):129-133. doi: 10.1007/BF00304038.

Gille, J.J.P., and H. Joenje. 1989. "Chromosomal instability and progressive loss of chromosomes in HeLa cells during adaptation to hyperoxic growth conditions." Mutation Research/DNAging no. 219 (4):225-230. doi: 10.1016/0921-8734 (89)90004-0.

Graham, K. A., C. L. Richardson, M. D. Minden, J. M. Trent, and R. N. Buick. 1985. "Varying degrees of amplification of the N-ras oncogene in the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7." Cancer Res no. 45 (5):2201-5.

Graham, Kathryn A, Jeffrey M Trent, C Kent Osborne, Charles M McGrath, Mark D Minden, and Ronald N Buick. 1986. "The use of restriction fragment polymorphisms to identify the cell line MCF-7." Breast cancer research and treatment no. 8 (1):29-34.

Grenman, S., A. Shapira, and T.E. Carey. 1988. "In vitro response of cervical cancer cell lines CaSki, HeLa, and ME-180 to the antiestrogen tamoxifen." Gynecologic oncology no. 30 (2):228-238. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258 (88)90029-7.

Hand, P.H., M. Nuti, D. Colcher, and J. Schlom. 1983. "Definition of antigenic heterogeneity and modulation among human mammary carcinoma cell populations using monoclonal antibodies to tumor-associated antigens." Cancer research no. 43 (2):728-735.

Harris, H., J.F. Watkins, G.L.M. Campbell, E.P. Evans, and C.E. Ford. 1965. "Mitosis in Hybrid Cells Derived from Mouse and Man." Nature no. 207 (4997):606-608. doi: 10.1038/207606a0.

Heneen, W.K. 1976. "HeLa cells and their possible contamination of other cell lines: karyotype studies." Hereditas no. 82 (2):217-247. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1976.tb01560.x.

Hered, J. 1960. A proposed standard system of nomenclature of human mitotic chromosomes. Paper read at Denver Conference of human chromosome study group, at Denver.

Hsu, T. C., and P.S. Moorhead. 1956. "Chromosome Anomalies in Neoplasms with Special Reference To the Mechanisms of Polyploidization and Aneuploidization in the HeLa Strain." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences no. 63 (6):1083-1094. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1956.tb32124.x.

Hsu, T.C. 1961. Chromosomal Evolution in Cell Populations: Academic Press.

Hughes, D.T. 1965. "The role of chromosomes in the characterisation of human neoplasms." European Journal of Cancer (1965) no. 1 (3):233-243. doi: 10.1016/0014-2964 (65)90055-1.

Jones, H. W., V. A. McKusick, P.S. Harper, and K.D. Wuu. 1971. "George Otto Gey (1889-1970): The HeLa Cell and a Reappraisal of Its Origin." Obstetrics and Gynecology no. 38 (no.6).

Koivusalo, R., E. Krausz, H. Helenius, and S. Hietanen. 2005. "Chemotherapy compounds in cervical cancer cells primed by reconstitution of p53 function after short interfering RNA-mediated degradation of human papillomavirus 18 E6 mRNA: opposite effect of siRNA in combination with different drugs." Molecular pharmacology no. 68 (2):372-382. doi: 10.1124/mol.105.011189.

Kraemer, P. M., L. L. Deaven, H. A. Crissman, J. A. Steinkamp, and D. F. Petersen. 1974. "On the Nature of Heteroploidy." Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology no. 38:133-144. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1974.038.01.017.

Landry, J.J.M., P.T. Pyl, T. Rausch, T. Zichner, M.M. Tekkedil, A.M. StŸtz, A. Jauch, R.S. Aiyar, G. Pau, and N. Delhomme. 2013. "The genomic and transcriptomic landscape of a HeLa cell line." G3: Genes| Genomes| Genetics. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.005777

Lavappa, K.S., M.L. Macy, and J.E. Shannon. 1976. "Examination of ATCC stocks for HeLa marker chromosomes in human cell lines." doi: 10.1038/259211a0.

Leone, V., T.C. Hsu, and C.M. Pomerat. 1955. "Cytological studies on HeLa, a strain of human cervical carcinoma." Zeitschrift fŸr Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie no. 41 (5):481-492. doi: 10.1007/BF00345357.

Ly, P., U. Eskiocak, S.B. Kim, A.I. Roig, S.K. Hight, D.R. Lulla, Y.S. Zou, K. Batten, W.E. Wright, and J.W. Shay. 2011. "Characterization of aneuploid populations with trisomy 7 and 20 derived from diploid human colonic epithelial cells." Neoplasia (New York, NY) no. 13 (4):348.

Macville, M, E Schršck, H Padilla-Nash, C Keck, B.M. Ghadimi, D. Zimonjic, N. Popescu, and T. Ried. 1999. "Comprehensive and definitive molecular cytogenetic characterization of HeLa cells by spectral karyotyping." Cancer Research no. 59 (1):141-150. doi: 198.74.230.230.

Mamaeva, S.E., L.F. Litvinchuk, and G.P. Pinaev. 1983. "Regularities of karyotype variability in continuous human cell lines." Doklady Akademii Nauk no. USSR (270):456-458.

Mincheva, A, L Gissmann, and H Zur Hausen. 1987. "Chromosomal integration sites of human papillomavirus DNA in three cervical cancer cell lines mapped by in situ hybridization." Medical microbiology and immunology no. 176 (5):245-256. doi: 10.1007/BF00190531.

Nelson-Rees, W. A., L. Hunter, G. J. Darlington, and S. J. O'Brien. 1980. "Characteristics of HeLa strains: Permanent vs. variable features." Cytogenetic and Genome Research no. 27 (4):216-231. doi: 10.1159/000131490.

Nelson-Rees, W.A., and R.R. Flandermeyer. 1976. "HeLa cultures defined." Science no. 191 (4222):96-98. doi: 10.1126/science.1246601

Nicholson, J.M., and D. Cimini. 2012. "Doubling the deck: Tetraploidy induces chromosome shuffling and cancer." Cell Cycle no. 11 (18):3355. doi: 10.4161/cc.21850.

Nicholson, J.M., and D. Cimini. 2013. "Cancer karyotypes: survival of the fittest." Frontiers in Oncology no. 3. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00148.

Norryd, C. 1959. "The Chromosomes of Three Human Strains " Hereditas no. 45 (2-3):449-460. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1959.tb03061.x.

Obara, Y., L.S. Chai, H. Weinfeld, and A.A. Sandberg. 1974. "Prophasing of interphase nuclei and induction of nuclear envelopes around metaphase chromosomes in HeLa and Chinese hamster homo-and heterokaryons." The Journal of cell biology no. 62 (1):104-113. doi: 10.1083/jcb.62.1.104.

Osborne, C Kent, Kimberly Hobbs, and Jeffrey M Trent. 1987. "Biological differences among MCF-7 human breast cancer cell lines from different laboratories." Breast cancer research and treatment no. 9 (2):111-121.

Pavelka, N., G Rancati, and R. Li. 2010. "Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: role of aneuploidy in cellular adaptation and cancer." Current Opinion in Cell Biology no. 22 (6):809-815. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.06.003.

Pavelka, N., G. Rancati, J. Zhu, W. Bradford, A. Saraf, L. Florens, B.W. Sanderson, G.L. Hattem, and R. Li. 2010. "Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast." Nature no. 468 (7321):321-325. doi: 10.1038/nature09529.

Popescu, N.C., and J.A. DiPaolo. 1989. "Preferential sites for viral integration on mammalian genome." Cancer genetics and cytogenetics no. 42 (2):157-171. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608 (89)90084-8.

Putral, L.N., M.J. Bywater, W. Gu, N.A. Saunders, B.G. Gabrielli, G.R. Leggatt, and N.A.J. McMillan. 2005. "RNA interference against human papillomavirus oncogenes in cervical cancer cells results in increased sensitivity to cisplatin." Molecular pharmacology no. 68 (5):1311-1319. doi: 10.1124/mol.105.014191

Rancati, G., N. Pavelka, B. Fleharty, A. Noll, R. Trimble, K. Walton, A. Perera, K. Staehling-Hampton, C.W. Seidel, and R. Li. 2008. "Aneuploidy Underlies Rapid Adaptive Evolution of Yeast Cells Deprived of a Conserved Cytokinesis Motor." Cell no. 135 (5):879-893. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.039.

Reddel, Roger R, Leigh C Murphy, Rosemary E Hall, and Robert L Sutherland. 1985. "Differential sensitivity of human breast cancer cell lines to the growth-inhibitory effects of tamoxifen." Cancer Research no. 45 (4):1525-1531.

Savelyeva, L., and S. Mamaeva. 1987. "Heterogeneity and balance of chromosomes in human cell line M-HeLa-76: analysis of 100 karyotypes." Cancer genetics and cytogenetics no. 28 (2):311-325. doi: 10.1016/0165-4608 (87)90218-4.

Seabright, M. 1973. "Improvement of Trypsin Method for Banding Chromosomes." The Lancet no. 301 (7814):1249-1250. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736 (73)90561-8.

Sheltzer, J.M., and A. Amon. 2011. "The aneuploidy paradox: costs and benefits of an incorrect karyotype." Trends in Genetics no. 27 (11):446-453. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.07.003.

Shi, Q., and R.W. King. 2005. "Chromosome nondisjunction yields tetraploid rather than aneuploid cells in human cell lines." Nature no. 437 (4061):1038-1042. doi: 10.1038/nature03958.

Singer, R.M., and W.H. Fishman. 1974. "Characterization of two HeLa sublines: TCRC-1 produces Regan isoenzyme and TCRC-2, non-Regan isoenzyme." J Cell Biol no. 60 (3):777-780. doi: 10.1083/jcb.60.3.777.

Spurna, V., and M. Hill. 1967. "Chromosomal composition of HeLa and L cells in tissue cultures." Neoplasma no. 14 (1):11-26.

Stanbridge, E.J., R.R. Flandermeyer, D.W. Daniels, and W.A. Nelson-Rees. 1981. "Specific chromosome loss associated with the expression of tumorigenicity in human cell hybrids." Somatic cell genetics no. 7 (6):699-712. doi: 10.1007/BF01538758.

Stone, D., and Y.S. Kang. 1964. "Isolation of a HeLa Sub-strain exhibiting Stem-lines of 138 and 148 Chromosomes." doi: 10.1038/202516a0.

Tjio, J.H., and T.T. Puck. 1958. "Genetics of somatic mammalian cells: II. Chromosomal constitution of cells in tissue culture." The Journal of experimental medicine no. 108 (2):259. doi: 10.1084/jem.108.2.259.

Upender, M. B., J. K. Habermann, L. M. McShane, E. L. Korn, J. C. Barrett, M. J. Difilippantonio, and T. Ried. 2004. "Chromosome transfer induced aneuploidy results in complex dysregulation of the cellular transcriptome in immortalized and cancer cells." Cancer Res no. 64 (19):6941-9. doi: 0.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0474

Vogt, M. 1959. "A Study of the Relationship between Karyotype and Phenotype in Cloned Lines of Strain Hela." Genetics no. 44 (6):1257.

Whang-Peng, Jacqueline, Elaine C Lee, Chien-Song R Kao-Shan, Katherine Seibert, and Marc Lippman. 1983. "Cytogenetic studies of human breast cancer lines: MCF-7 and derived variant sublines." Journal of the National Cancer Institute no. 71 (4):687-695.

Showing 3 Reviews

  • Placeholder
    Nathan Fisher
    Originality of work
    Quality of writing
    Quality of figures
    Confidence in paper
    1

    Thanks for this submission examining the chromosomal stability of HeLa cells.  Standardization (or at least knowledge of inter-lab differences) with respect to commonly used cell lines is an important area across all of science (it is very important in my own specialty of bacteriology) but it is all too often ignored.
    I do have a few comments and suggestions for your manuscript and these are below.
    1. I suggest including your conclusions within your abstract so that readers can more readily understand your findings.
    2. The details about "HeLa" contamination are interesting but not necessarily germane to your point.  Problems with contamination and good lab practices are separate from the question of genetic stability over time and consistency between labs.
    3. hmmm. line numbers would be nice.  In paragraph 7:" novel chromosome makers for HeLa"; makers should be markers
    4. Recommend restructuring with clearer subsections and including results, discussion and conclusions sections.
    5. Would appreciate some comment on which types of studies are impacted most severely by changes in chromosome number.  Surely HeLa cells remain appropriate for some studies, but might not be appropriate to others where these variances can have considerable effect?

    I have no competing interests.




  • Placeholder
    Ashwin kumar
    0

    Am always looking for this kind of informative post.Now with the help of this Junction am able to play hearts card game free of cost and online.This is also a multiplayer card game platform.Follow this 
    play hearts online and make your free time memorable.Thank you so much.

  • Placeholder
    elizabeth boatright
    0

    The contents which you have shared in this blog is very accurate. From your blog, I got a well-structured writing. I am very impressed with the quality of content. Each post are maintained a good quality. Thanks for the well wrote the post. It has wonderful and interesting information. Refer custom essay writing service to get the best service.

    This review has 1 comments. Click to view.

License

This article and its reviews are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and redistribution in any medium, provided that the original author and source are credited.