Scattering processes predicted by Topological Dipole Field Theory

  1. 1.  Technische Universität Darmstadt

Abstract

The Standard model of particle physics is successful in the description of many scattering processes in nature. There are also phenomena in nature like the Baryon asymmetry that are based on scattering processes which cannot be described by the Standard model. This research paper treats simple scattering processeses which are predicted by Topological Dipole Field Theory. These scattering processes have their origin in additional interactions between gauge bosons.

 

Introduction

 

Despite the large progresses in theoretical and experimental physics there are still a couple of phenomena which cannot be described by modern and well-established theories. Such phenomena require an extension of well-known physical models. An example of such an extension is the Supersymmetric Standard Model (Fayet 1975). Since the Standard model doesn’t include gravitational interactions, also Quantum Gravity models were proposed (Sundance 2007). A recent extension of the Standard model is the Topological Dipole Field Theory (TDFT) which assumes that gauge bosons couple to an intrinsic dipole moment (Linker 2015). This theory adds a 2-form field  to the ordinary 2-form gauge field strength  where  is an additional degree of freedom,  is the gauge connection and  is the gauge coupling constant. The field  is an observable of a Witten-type topological quantum field theory. TDFT is originally based on Čech cohomology and can be formulated with a Lagrangian density that is independent on the choice of the topological bases that generate the Čech cohomology. The Lagrangian density of TDFT depends on the 2-form fields  and  and also on a Lagrange multiplier  where it is integrated over all possible real-valued fields  and . The 4-form topological Lagrangian density has the form:

Here,  is the coupling constant for the coupling to the topological dipole. The Lagrangian (1) generates a Lorentz-invariant and real-valued action. If the action is dimensionless and lengths or times have dimension 1 the 2-form fields  and  must have dimension -2, while  and  are dimensionless.

An example of an unsolved problem in physics is the Baryon asymmetry (Sakharov 1991). Baryon asymmetry means that number of baryons is higher than the number of antibaryons in the universe. Another unsolved problem in physics is the origin of dark energy (Peebles et al. 2003). The fluctuations in dark energy are much stronger than the Standard model of particle physics is predicting. These phenomena can be described by TDFT more precisely since there are additional terms involved that modify the dynamics of some scattering processes. Moreover, phenomena related with dark energy and the creation of particles and antiparticles depends strongly on the dynamics of gauge bosons.

In this research paper it is shown how to calculate scattering processes that arise from these additional terms of TDFT. From the structure of the Lagrangian density Feynman rules for scattering with intrinsic topological dipoles are constructed. Also expectation values of topological dipole correlations are computed. After the treatment of basic Feynman rules, a transition probability per time is computed for a simple scattering process. This scattering process is a modified propagation of a gauge boson within a short time. After the calculation of the transition amplitude, the computational results are discussed with respect to baryon asymmetry and dark energy.

 

Theory

 

The theory is based on the topological action (1) on a spacetime manifold  which can be written in coordinate basis that is denoted by Greek indices as follows:

Here, the Latin indices (here: ) are running over all Lie group generators  of the gauge theory which satisfy .

 

Feynman rules for TDFT

 

For the Standard model of particle physics Feynman rules are well-known. Feynman rules for Standard model propagators and vertices are in TDFT exactly the same as in the ordinary Standard model. The only difference between the TDFT and the Standard model is that there are occurring the interaction terms  and  when the generalized 2-form field strength  is expanded around  in the Lagrangian density. When these interaction terms are expanded out in the path integral one obtains additional self-interactions in the gauge bosons. More precisely, one obtains for all possible interactions with topological dipoles the expression:

From (3) it is easy to see that there is a product of  fields  in the term indexed with . If the gauge theory is abelian then the term indexed with describes  self-interacting gauge bosons. In the nonabelian case, the factor  can be expanded in powers of .  May be  the power of  occurring in the Taylor series expansion. Then the term indexed with  has  self-interacting gauge bosons. A Feynman diagram which describes a -boson self-interaction is denoted as a rectangle with  legs (which illustrating incoming and outgoing bosons) that are attached to this rectangle. Inside the rectangle two numbers  separated with comma are written. The number  is the power of , while  is the power of the contribution . Consequently, there has to be computed the expectation value of a product of  tensor fields . The following example shows a Feynman diagram for a 4-boson interaction.

 

Figure 1: 4-boson interaction; Bosons are denoted by straight lines

 

For usual, there are written ingoing and outgoing momenta and polarizations on the legs of the rectangle. Moreover, the product of fields  which has to be computed is written next to the rectangle. The product  of  fields  is defined as

where the averaging  denotes the weighted average with weighting factor . An easy calculation shows that (4) can be written as:

If (5) is further evaluated one observes that the exponent of  in the integrand of (5) increases with .  Integration over  and normalizing (in this research paper it is assumed that the path integral normalization factor is included in the functional integration measure) yields powers of an infinite quantity . In nonvanishing terms  this infinite quantity is of order  and can easily be absorbed in the bare coupling constant  by setting . The coupling constant  is (when other UV divergences are absorbed) a physical constant. The minimum number of factors  where (5) is nonvanishing is  since it holds  and .

 

Modified propagation of a boson

 

Considering a vector boson with initial energy-momentum state  and initial polarization , the vector boson goes to the final energy-momentum state  and final polarization . Then the probability density that this boson is involved in this reaction within a time  and within a volume  denoted by  in the Lorentz-invariant phase space volume  has the form:

Here,  is the kinetic energy of the incoming boson,  the kinetic energy of the outgoing boson and  the expectation value of the T-Matrix associated with the 2-boson self-interaction. From (3) it can be observed that the term  is the only term with nonvanishing topological expectation value  and without boson loop contributions which describes a 2-boson interaction. The UV divergent Loop contributions which arise in higher exponents  can be absorbed by renormalization. For simplicity, only the term  is considered. Transforming this term into -space one obtains:

In equation (7) the expression  denotes the observation interval in spacetime direction  (with  and ) and a contraction in  due to the factor with  was performed. Also fluctuations in energy and momentum are included in equation (7). Therefore the transition probability per unit time (6) also allows processes with nonconservation of energy and nonconservation of momentum. For large observation time the sinc-function can be approximated as a delta distribution and energy and momentum is conserved in transitions. The transition rate is proportional to  and is assumed to be small; hence, a small deviation from ordinary Standard model is included by adding TDFT transition probabilities. If the boson polarizations in (6) does not matter it can be averaged over all possible polarizations. In the limit of very large momentum absolute values  the transition probability (6) decreases as . It makes sense that the transition probability decreases rapidly with momentum excess .

 

Conclusions

 

The transition amplitudes given by the equations (6) and (7) are a model for boson density fluctuations. Bosons that undergo stochastic noise in small time scales can explain why dark energy fluctuations are much higher than the Standard model of particle physics predict. It makes sense that the highest amount of dark energy was present a few Planck times after the Big Bang since fluctuations predicted by TDFT were very significant. Baryon asymmetry arises from the high fluctuations in energy and momentum during this time period. The high-energy regions tend more to particle-antiparticle creation than the low-energy regions.  

References

 

Fayet, P. "Supergauge invariant extension of the Higgs mechanism and a model for the electron and its neutrino." Nuclear Physics B, 2014, 90: 104. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(75)90636-7

 

Sundance, O. et al. "Quantum gravity and the standard model." Class.Quant.Grav., 2007, 24: 3975-3994. doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/24/16/002

 

Linker, P. "Topological Dipole Field Theory." The Winnower, 2015, 2: e144311.19292. doi: 10.15200/winn.144311.19292

 

Linker, P. "Nonabelian Generalization of Topological Dipole Field Theory." The Winnower, 2015, 2: e144564.43935. doi: 10.15200/winn.144564.43935

 

Sakharov, D. "Violation of CP invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe." Soviet Physics Uspekhi, 1991, 34 (5): 392–393. doi: 10.1070/PU1991v034n05ABEH002497

 

Peebles, P. J. E. & Ratra, B. "The cosmological constant and dark energy." Reviews of Modern Physics, 2003, 75 (2): 559–606. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.559. arXiv:astro-ph/0207347

 

 

Showing 5 Reviews

  • Placeholder
    Kiran Adhikari
    Originality of work
    Quality of writing
    Quality of figures
    Confidence in paper
    2

    As far as I can see, mathematical calculations are correct. They are proved rigorously. The result concerning energy-momentum fluctuations is also very interesting, especially that it is a candidate explanation for Baryon Symmetry.

  • Placeholder
    José Roberto Mahon
    Originality of work
    Quality of writing
    Quality of figures
    Confidence in paper
    1

    Excellent work with rigorous calculations. This paper treats simple scattering processes which are predicted by dipole topological field theory. These scattering processes have their origin in additional interactions between gauge bosons. It nice and makes sense that the highest amount of dark energy was present a few Planck times after the big bang since fluctuations predicted by TDFT were very significant. It's very nice paper. Well written and anyone can understand. It only the rigorous calculus are very hard to understand it! But it is a good work.

  • 7 reasons the multiverse is not a valid alternative to god p1  jm2
    Ritchie Yan
    Originality of work
    Quality of writing
    Confidence in paper
    1

    Your conclusion was interesting and was very good. I liked when refer to Planck time after the Big Bang which predicted by TDFT. I understand the TDFT and the standard model much better now. I like your explanation of the scattering process with the standard model by using TDFT as model and theory to nature.

    "The transition amplitudes given by the equations (6) and (7) are a model for boson density fluctuations. Bosons that undergo stochastic noise in small time scales can explain why dark energy fluctuations are much higher than the Standard model of particle physics predict. It makes sense that the highest amount of dark energy was present a few Planck times after the Big Bang since fluctuations predicted by TDFT were very significant. Baryon asymmetry arises from the high fluctuations in energy and momentum during this time period. The high-energy regions tend more to particle-antiparticle creation than the low-energy regions."

  • Placeholder
    Ritahi Oussama
    Originality of work
    Quality of writing
    Quality of figures
    Confidence in paper
    1

    It's very nice paper ! Well written and anyone can understand it only the mathematicals formula are very hard to understand it ! It's good work :)

  • Placeholder
    Somak Chaudhuri
    Originality of work
    Quality of writing
    Quality of figures
    Confidence in paper
    1

    I was expecting a Boson-Feynmann quadrature, however theory has been explained in a far more lucid manner. Very well deduced calculations.

License

This article and its reviews are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and redistribution in any medium, provided that the original author and source are credited.